This library is built in the open.
If you spot an error, have a suggestion, or just want to say hello — we’d love to hear from you.

...small parts of fragments which previously lay hidden have been added)
T original: accessit (Luke 22:20—23:20 has been added) Tb Tc Td wb wd (we) Γ (larger portions of the Gospels of Matthew and John have been added)
Θb Θc Θd Θe Θf Θg Θh Ξ Π. Regarding the Acts of the Apostles, there follow א Codex Sinaiticus G (Chapter 2:44—3:8, from the 7th century), p (from the 8th or 9th century, containing almost the entire Acts): for the Catholic Epistles א P (which has them almost in their entirety):
for the letters of Paul H (to the 14 leaves are added another 7 from 2 Corinthians 4; Colossians 3; 1 Thessalonians 2 and 4; Hebrews 1 and 10) N (from the 8th or 9th century, from Galatians and Hebrews) o (from the 6th century, from 1 Corinthians) p (the epistles are almost complete) q (papyrus fragments from approximately the 5th century, from 1 Corinthians) R (6th century, fragments of chapter 4 of the letter to the Ephesians):
for the Apocalypse the Book of Revelation א P (almost complete). We have already published from the codices ancient handwritten books of the entire New Testament א B C as well as Fa I. From the codices of the Gospels: Ib L N (the London, Vatican, and Vienna leaves) oa P Q R Wa Wc Y Θa. Likewise, we have prepared for publication Tb Tc Td wb Θb c d e f g h. We have transcribed in full M and Π. We ourselves have accurately collated carefully compared word-for-word against a printed standard with the published editions E G H K O S U X, as well as Γ Δ. We have personally examined all the rest (most of which were already published previously), except for Z, the original: Matthaeum Dublinensem Matthew of Dublin. Furthermore, from the remaining parts of the New Testament, we have published D (the Claromontanus) of the letters of Paul, M (fragments of the letters of Paul), P (Acts, epistles, and the Apocalypse), and B (the Basilian-Vatican Apocalypse); we have designated for publication from our own transcripts E of Acts, G of Acts, H of the letters of Paul, and N O Q. In addition to H of Acts, K of the epistles, and L of Acts and epistles, we have also recently investigated E (the Sangermanensis) of the letters of Paul more accurately in St. Petersburg.
Now, from these facts, it will be sufficiently clear how much the critical apparatus—which in the editions of Wetstein, Griesbach, Scholz, and even Lachmann, was filled with the defects of imperfect collation—has advanced over these last ten years and more, both in its abundance and its reliability. Indeed, it has also received other reinforcements, both from minuscule manuscripts written in smaller, cursive-like Greek script, generally later than the capital-letter uncials codices and especially from ancient versions and the Church Fathers; those who are accustomed to using critical editions will easily notice this by examining the book. Thus, the evidence of the Latin codices, and—