This library is built in the open.
If you spot an error, have a suggestion, or just want to say hello — we’d love to hear from you.

The illustration on this folio is one of the more distinct botanical drawings in the manuscript. It features a large, egg-shaped head covered in overlapping, scale-like structures in shades of green and brown, topped by a small, three-lobed blue flower. The plant possesses a thin, reddish stem and a peculiar root system consisting of five thick, finger-like tubers. Some scholars have compared this drawing to a Teasel (Dipsacus) or a type of Thistle, though the specific combination of features does not perfectly match any known species.
48
original: "48" — This numeral, likely added by a later hand, refers to an older pagination or cataloging system for the manuscript.
pox82ody czetey czordy qotta
chor dy czettey dzettey dany sary
otteroy dy tteey tteey dar polleid
folletoz ciorora cpatty dety qotta
2ody fottcey qott ctor dy ssy
occoy tteyo doy cffey 2 chor8
ctor tteey dany
ottery dany deey
otta ctor dy dy
tteo tteey tta
tttor dy ary
The text is divided into two sections. The upper paragraph surrounds the top of the plant, while the shorter lines at the bottom are placed near the root system. This layout suggests the text may describe different parts of the plant, such as the medicinal properties of the flower versus the roots. In a medieval herbarium (a book of plants), the text typically detailed where the plant grew, when to harvest it, and what ailments it cured—such as skin conditions, digestive issues, or use as a dye.