Critique of Judgement (Bernard Translation) (1914) - Page 8

	PAGE
§ 5. Comparison of the three specifically different kinds of satisfaction The three kinds refer to the Pleasant, the Beautiful, and the Good. . . . .	53
Second Moment of the judgement of taste, namely according to quantity	55
§ 6. The Beautiful is that which, apart from concepts, is represented as the object of a universal satisfaction .	55
§ 7. Comparison of the Beautiful with the Pleasant and the Good by means of the above characteristic .	57
§ 8. The universality of the satisfaction is represented in a judgement of Taste only as subjective . .	59
§ 9. Investigation of the question whether in a judgement of taste the feeling of pleasure precedes or follows the judging of the object . . .	63
Third Moment of judgements of taste according to the relation of the purposes original: "purposes" (finis); referring here to the "ends" or goals an object appears to serve which are brought into consideration therein . . . . .	67
§ 10. Of purposiveness term: "purposiveness" (Zweckmäßigkeit) refers to the appearance of design or being "fit for a purpose" without necessarily having a specific goal. in general . . .	67
§ 11. The judgement of taste has nothing at its basis but the form of the purposiveness of an object (or of its mode of representation) . . .	69
§ 12. The judgement of taste rests on grounds known from the outset original: "a priori"; knowledge that proceeds from theoretical deduction rather than from observation or experience. .	70
§ 13. The pure judgement of taste is independent of charm and emotion . . . .	72
§ 14. Clarification by means of examples . . .	73
§ 15. The judgement of taste is quite independent of the concept of perfection . . . .	77
§ 16. The judgement of taste, by which an object is declared to be beautiful under the condition of a definite concept, is not pure . . . .	81
§ 17. Of the Ideal of Beauty . . . .	84
Fourth Moment of the judgement of taste, according to the modality term: "modality" refers to the way in which a judgement is made—whether it is seen as possible, actual, or necessary. of the satisfaction in the object .	91
§ 18. What the modality in a judgement of taste is	91
§ 19. The subjective necessity which we attribute to the judgement of taste is conditioned . . .	92
§ 20. The condition of necessity which a judgement of taste asserts is the Idea of a common sense	92
§ 21. Do we have grounds for presupposing a common sense?	93
§ 22. The necessity of the universal agreement that is thought in a judgement of taste is a subjective necessity, which is represented as objective under the presupposition of a common sense .	94

CONTENTS