/
This library is built in the open.
If you spot an error, have a suggestion, or just want to say hello — we’d love to hear from you.

| § 1. | Doctrine of Adam Smith on the competition of capital | 285 |
| 2. | Doctrine of Mr. Wakefield respecting the field of employment | 287 |
| 3. | What determines the minimum rate of profit | 289 |
| 4. | In opulent countries, profits are habitually near the minimum | 292 |
| 5. | Prevented from reaching it by commercial revulsions | 296 |
| 6. | Prevented by improvements in production | 298 |
| 7. | Prevented by the importation of cheap necessities and instruments | 300 |
| 8. | Prevented by the emigration of capital | 302 |
| § 1. | The withdrawal of capital is not necessarily a national loss | 304 |
| 2. | In opulent countries, the extension of machinery is not detrimental, but beneficial to laborers | 307 |
| § 1. | The stationary state of wealth and population is dreaded and deprecated by writers | 311 |
| 2. | But it is not in itself undesirable | 313 |
| § 1. | The theory of dependence and protection is no longer applicable to the condition of modern society | 318 |
| 2. | The future well-being of the laboring classes is principally dependent on their own mental cultivation | 323 |
| 3. | Probable effects of improved intelligence in causing a better adjustment of population; this would be promoted by the social independence of women | 326 |
| 4. | Tendency of society toward the disuse of the relation of hiring and service | 327 |
| 5. | Examples of the association of laborers in the profits of industrial undertakings | 329 |
| 6. | Probable future development of this principle | 337 |