EPISTLE.

...I fear, however, that my arguments cannot be sufficiently understood by many, both because they are somewhat long and because some parts depend upon others; but primarily because they require a mind entirely free from all prejudices original: "praeiudiciis" and one that can easily detach itself from the influence of the senses. Certainly, one does not find more people in the world suited for Metaphysical studies than for Geometric ones.

Furthermore, there is this difference between the two: in Geometry, because everyone is convinced that nothing is usually written there without a certain proof original: "demonstratio", the unlearned err more often by approving false things (simply because they wish to appear as if they understand them) than by refuting true ones.

By contrast, in Philosophy, because it is believed that there is no topic that cannot be argued from both sides, very few people actually search for the truth. Instead, far more people seek a reputation for cleverness by daring to attack original: "impugnare," inferred from the catchword "im-" even the most excellent...

Metaphysics, Geometry, Philosophy, proof, prejudices