/
This library is built in the open.
If you spot an error, have a suggestion, or just want to say hello — we’d love to hear from you.

| Article | Page | |
|---|---|---|
| 103. | Comparison of the force between different electrified systems | 119 |
| 104. | Mechanical action on a specific part original: "element" of an electrified surface | 121 |
| 105. | Comparison between theories of direct action action at a distance and theories of stress | 122 |
| 106. | The kind of stress required to account for the phenomenon | 123 |
| 107. | The hypothesis of stress considered as a step in electrical science | 126 |
| 108. | The hypothesis of stress shown original: "shewn" to account for the equilibrium of the medium and for the forces acting between electrified bodies | 128 |
| 109. | Statements of Faraday relative to the longitudinal tension and lateral pressure of the lines of force | 131 |
| 110. | Objections to stress in a fluid considered | 131 |
| 111. | Statement of the theory of electric polarization | 132 |
| 112. | Conditions of a point of equilibrium | 135 |
| 113. | Number of points of equilibrium | 136 |
| 114. | At a point or line of equilibrium there is a conical point or a line where the equipotential surface intersects itself | 137 |
| 115. | Angles at which an equipotential surface intersects itself | 138 |
| 116. | The equilibrium of an electrified body cannot be stable | 139 |
| 117. | Practical importance of knowing these forms in simple cases | 142 |
| 118. | Two electrified points, ratio 4 : 1. (Figure I) | 143 |
| 119. | Two electrified points, ratio 4 : — 1. (Figure II) | 144 |
| 120. | An electrified point in a uniform field of force. (Figure III) | 145 |
| 121. | Three electrified points. Two spherical equipotential surfaces. (Figure IV) | 145 |
| 122. | Faraday’s use of the concept original: "conception" of lines of force | 146 |
| 123. | Method employed in drawing the diagrams | 147 |