This library is built in the open.
If you spot an error, have a suggestion, or just want to say hello — we’d love to hear from you.

particular instance, unfortunately, those who should have been most capable of directing public opinion on the subject of Mesmer's alleged discoveries chose to assume an attitude of perfect indifference, or of actual, violent, uncompromising, and most unreasonable hostility.
It may be noted, however, that not all of the great contemporary luminaries of science viewed the reality of the early magnetic discoveries in this way; and the opinions of such men as Jussieu, Laplace, Cuvier, Treviranus, Hufeland, Sprengel, Schleirmacher, Oken, Reil, Autenrieth, Burdach, Humboldt, and many other eminent authorities—philosophers, naturalists, physiologists, and professional physicians—should have carried more weight with the intelligent and candid portion of the public. Indeed, the very simple, yet productive and most interesting nature of the discoveries alleged to have been made by Mesmer and his associates and disciples should, at least, have had the effect of stimulating curiosity and promoting inquiry.
In the whole history of scientific discovery, indeed, there is perhaps nothing more incomprehensible—we might add more paltry and contemptible—than the indifference and hostility which were so long displayed toward the interesting labors of the early Magnetists. What could be