Maximos the Confessor (Cambridge, Trinity College, MS O.3.48)

disappearance denies; for not only the true, the
sovereign [things] the state of the matters they allow;
but the immutable designations; through

Note: I think because of this ...?
toward religion by the names
of designations ...?
the matters ...?

Where is it impious to confess two natures [of] Christ
according to the reason of the difference, of the things from which [are] the
natures, and after the union [they] appear
we imagine; as the same being and impassible
after the union; for if God and man is
Christ after the union and according to the common confes-
sion, it is clear that the matters we used
immortal names after the union; and it is not necessary
to be because of the [things of] Christ ever without the matter
name; the one providing through itself the naming
and itself one unmixed it stands apart.
If the matters [are] both the names; not
receiving after the union the Christ, what after these properly
according to none [has he] been called [and] has it to be shown
the designations and the matters they
divide. And if you say God and man by name
to be called the Christ, and not by matter; not what to me
the more godless; here so much [in] madness
avoiding; they would say not to be destitute
of matters upon Christ the designations after
the union; [it is] evident they do not avoid to say
the two of Christ after the union designa-

tions, thus also the two natures of Christ from which and
in which he consists; to refute we say after the union,
to which also the designations: if as the impassible to him
equally, they confess of him to live by matter
they give, according to nature the things brought after the
union; and as of God two nature indivisible

Note: Concerning the things in two natures
and in which [the] matter is united
after the union ...?
the natures and the ...?

the same being; you accuse only, as of both
and God [and] man he is. As if encompassing
saying Christ from divinity and human-
ity. Not indeed of this only, as from parts only.
Thus also in two natures saying, after the un-
ion with correctness and truth let it be stamped
we say, as being confessed; [as] parts of Christ [are] divinity
of him and humanity, from which and in which
he subsists. And again indeed of the Word of God nature
enfleshed in flesh, intellectual and logical,
Having how great a voice and to proclaim
we were taught according to the holy Cyril through
saying "enfleshed," the nature according to us,
into having been brought equally is essentialized the essence; as
of the same and one Christ the sufferings
and the miracles; and of the same the two natures
the one pre-eternal incorporeally, from the Father; and
the temporal from part and flesh, bodily
for us having become; therefore, especially and according to
truth strictly [as] Mother of God (Theotokos), being confessed; as