Maximos the Confessor (Cambridge, Trinity College, MS O.3.48)

for from the nakedness before all the ages
divinity, through these times with itself hav-
ing been enfleshed having become. A single [nature] com-
† posite of Christ enfleshed we refuse to say, not
only because of the aforementioned causes; but also not
seeming at all of the divisible of these we declare
until now. Of all having said: the nature
and as evident to him; of Marius the heretic:
of his students existing: for us to learn,
having rejected the stone the impiety. The
according to hypostasis in the voices he changes; for not
nature indeed monadic wicked to him thinking
so that concordantly to be preserved the from both
natures and after the union unconfused of the proper-
ties. Thus for us hypostatic [nature] in, for
singly, until indeed by itself the things having come together from each other
separated it presents to the imagination.
And until, one is the enfleshed God Word. And after
the incarnation. And indeed before the humanization
as the nature, the union I refuse logically
† the but hypostasis by confusion enfleshment [to] the [point] of not
but the hypostasis one, composite after the having become human
is confessed the same. And one, the holy [from]
of the divine trinity, with the humanity properly
the divinity. And entirely, directly he himself to the
looking of the divinity through the humanity;
† already and all composite hypostasis, to each other.

Concerning the naming of composite
nature which was discussed, which
not even he refused,
according to which every composite
nature coeval of one
symbol having, not
rightly according to the same reason
composite nature.

coeval are called the parts. For they think
the same absurdity to be gathered,
and to those saying one of Christ com-
posed hypostasis. Not rightly according to
my, I hope, to assume reason.
For not simply every composite hypostasis
to each other coeval has the parts
according to the generation. But that under nature
composition evidently finishing, and form
having the proper of it being accused.
Or that of the common and universal of the accused
essence or nature the
sum of the things about it properties
having been intertwined having, nature it is
that is essence with properties. If therefore
composite the under which finishes nature is,
and the accused form and itself
composite to be entirely [is] necessity,
and to each other coeval to be called
parts, because of the accused of it
essence or nature thus existing,
as the same being to the form without-
the distinguishing of it markers. For just as the simply
called hypostasis defining we say: hypo-
* stasis is essence with, the essence [is] some
of the things according to each [individual] comprehensive of the
in the