New Conversations

[op]posed; thus, without anyone noticing, Theology and Morality would have necessarily changed their appearance. The task would have been easy in those days; I do not know if it will be so now. Disciples of those great men I was telling you about have decided to undertake it, and they are promoting a new Philosophy to the best of their ability. Since their intention is good, and all this only tends to continue the plan of our Reformation The speaker uses "Reformation" here not necessarily to mean the Protestant movement, but a general intellectual and spiritual "re-forming" of Catholic thought., I would be grateful to them if they did not do two things. The first is to attribute to Descartes the glory of an invention that belongs to my Great-great-grandfather Trisayeul: An ancestor, specifically a great-great-grandfather. The speaker is claiming a direct intellectual and family lineage from Giordano Bruno. and to me. And the second is that they take as gospel original: "pour argent comptant," an idiom meaning to take something at face value or as absolute truth. all the daydreams that Descartes added of his own accord, which are nevertheless entirely suited to ruin Christian Morals from top to bottom, if they were not already ruined.

They are quite wrong on both these points, I said to him; but I am not clever enough to untangle what Descartes has mixed of his own into the speculations of your Great-great-grandfather Jordanus Brunus Giordano Bruno (1548–1600), the Italian friar and philosopher famous for his cosmological theories and for being executed by the Roman Inquisition., whose works I have never read. I do not even know Descartes' Philosophy well enough...