This library is built in the open.
If you spot an error, have a suggestion, or just want to say hello — we’d love to hear from you.

(Numbers in bold type correspond to the paragraph numbers used in both the Armenian text and this translation.
Page numbers in italics refer to the original text; page numbers in standard type refer to this translation.)
I. POSITIVE TEACHING ON GOD: inscrutable, eternal, unique, creator: 1 ......................................................................................... 9 11
II. FIRST GENERAL RESPONSE: 2-3
1. Regarding the problem of evil, which will be treated at length in Section I of Part I: addressed to the pagan Greeks, the Magi, and the heretics: 2 ................................................................................................. 10 12
The "Magi" refers to the Zoroastrian priestly caste of ancient Persia, whose dualistic beliefs Eznik argues against.
2. Regarding the non-aseity of creatures, which will be treated at length in Section II of Part I (excluding the conclusion of Part I): 3 ................................................................................. 11 13
Aseity is a theological term meaning "existence from oneself." Non-aseity refers to the status of created beings who depend on a creator for their existence.
original Armenian: "artakʻinkʻ." This term literally means "those outside" and refers to non-Christians, specifically pagan philosophers and practitioners of other religions.
I. THE PROBLEM OF EVIL AND FREEDOM 4-230
1. Adversaries under consideration: the Greeks 4-144
A. Against the Valentinians: the origin of evil: Man's disobedience 4-56
The Valentinians were a prominent Gnostic sect in the early Christian era, named after their founder Valentinus.
a. PRESENTATION OF THEIR SOLUTION 4 ............................................................................. 14 17
b. RESPONSE 5-56
α. DIFFICULTY OF THE QUESTION 5 .................................................................. 15 18
β. RESPONSE PROPERLY SO-CALLED 6-56
α'. Impossibility of two uncreated beings (God and matter) coexisting 6-12 ................................................................................................................. 15 19
I. God within matter 7-11 ............................................................................. 15 19
1. The whole of God within the whole of matter 8 ............................ 15 19
2. God within a part of the matter 9 ................................................... 15 19