This library is built in the open.
If you spot an error, have a suggestion, or just want to say hello — we’d love to hear from you.

These things are from the works of Caesarius Caesarius of Nazianzus, a physician and brother of Gregory the Great, often cited in theological debates., the brother? of Basil the Great... invocations of Longinus... likewise?
See: this Longinus Cassius Longinus (c. 213–273 AD), a rhetorician and philosopher who was a contemporary of Plotinus. Plotinus famously said of him, "Longinus is a philologist, but in no way a philosopher.", along with those wise men, has indeed been called eternal. And in that place, he spoke of spirit original: "πνεῦμα" (pneuma); a term meaning breath, spirit, or a vital force in both Stoic philosophy and Christian theology.. Just as the Muses [inspired] Hesiod, not at all wanting to give a name derived from other names, for even that man—namely Longinus—is spoken of in this way. Thus, did he write to the royal court or "to Basil," depending on the context of the address regarding the previous man? He turned toward the Kingdom; and he mentions him through the company of those most-famed men, now kneeling once again; it is for this reason he speaks. For one must consider him the offspring of those men, their very brother. And he says he clearly knows the pine tree original: "πεύκην" (peuke); this may be a metaphorical reference to a specific person or a play on the material nature of the soul.. It is clear that he himself is looking at his first writings and those things praised by many. But now the father says clearly, though speaking of a human being—for he does not call God an "offspring"—that he has laid down this whole matter because of what is common to it. Clearly, according to this phrasing, some say this rarely, though in these things nothing is truly signified. Regarding this person who speaks of "spirit," he held within him memories of the things mentioned there, the truly vivid images of a man, such as those of the great educations. If, again, through books—which we do not have for reading by those who know—it should be given to you by right thinking, so that you might use it even for destruction, as if produced by him, nor indeed should you serve their entire collection of writings. This man, therefore, having been organized, is found to be refuted. But he spoke of "spirit" in proverbs, which is of great value. After these things, you [speak] about the ship; so it happens in this place. Now these men justly take advantage of some; otherwise, the one who follows the will is persuaded by the advice offered regarding this. In this matter, therefore, they greatly encompass those who exist because of these very things, so that nevertheless, concerning these discoveries of his, such things are done with his own diligence. For having once taken away from one who was contemplating, he came—whoever it was—toward dreadful things, so that he might be prepared. He says this in the time of Constantine Emperor Constantine the Great, whose reign marked the transition of the Roman Empire to Christianity., or the matters of the song, as is fitting for friends. To us, this poet seems ridiculous in the matters of the dialogue. He insists on both and rejects them. But as for kneeling—for the one who from the beginning desired such things.
They pursue. The same difference... to happen behind them as with those five; or whatever he wishes to happen. But he thinks that the matter is administered by Basil Basil of Caesarea, a key figure in forming early Christian dogma who integrated Neoplatonic concepts into his theology.. But if they talk nonsense about such things to him, both the matter of Jesus and the voice. It appeared humble in form, and he is proclaimed by the new sophists A term often used by traditional philosophers to mock contemporary rhetorical teachers who lacked depth.. And the whole murder, yet having something within them that is established. And the poets do not appear to any to perform this necessary task, being taken in a dream under the things that perhaps belong to nature. He accused him of being a pine tree because of the matters of matter original: "ὕλη" (hyle); the fundamental substance of the physical world in Aristotelian and Platonic thought., yet he will be persuaded, though he is about to be persuaded, that the things from without consist of it. But the most shadowy things, rather than the others. If, through the ornamentation—you did not say what she said, but if indeed he shook these things to loosen them. This has fallen into ignorance of those things that seem right to us. For these things—and the books are nothing in truth concerning the embassies of those who are puffed up—and not much compared to what the farmer himself will know. He lays claim to the very entrance and such things; and if of those things being well-established... regarding what sort of nature it was necessary to speak. And a palinode original: "παλινῳδία"; a poem or song in which the author retracts something said in a former poem. occurred so that knowledge was surpassed. And that is what remains. The most bitter books, fairly enough, and honoring the friend of truth A common philosophical epithet for a sincere seeker of wisdom. himself, to be persuaded by the one who writes such things through sufferings. Nevertheless, he writes of demons original: "δαίμονας" (daimones); in this context, intermediary spirits between gods and humans, not necessarily "demons" in the modern evil sense.. It is the nature of the writer not to do this; not indeed, even if Longinus held an opinion about the father. Whoever was most energetic in the same things, I would signal. It will show how the father, writing to me, [asks] what is the use of the whole. To examine me, to be called from my own home toward him, the matter of the voice; and these things seem to be in the book. He says that as many things of the father as do not seem right—or rather, are in common. For he does not declare the warlike nature because of ceasing the matter regarding where it may happen to sprout, even if nothing [exists] because of the knowing.