This library is built in the open.
If you spot an error, have a suggestion, or just want to say hello — we’d love to hear from you.

...honor and life; or more easily again [to speak] against the body; concerning the passions, and therefore not even concerning perception; of the extraordinary totally. original: "παντωνικῶς" (pantonikos) — likely meaning 'in every way' or 'completely'. Ammonius and Eusebius, those who shared in that time, wrote concerning quality; but from there, not a few things were sacrificed against him; yet we discerned the things that were saved. The mathematicians original: "ἀριθμητικοὶ" (arithmetikoi) spoke briefly. The One; The One (to Hen) is the supreme, transcendent source of all reality in Plotinus's system. and the things according to each individual; and the works concerning the souls are all-encompassing. Just as if they were images; the divine. The will; that which concerns the philosopher and the Good; and the consequences; concerning Platonic matters; concerning those things found in the texts, he did not simply use the texts of the books, but made his own reason original: "λόγον" (logon) always remain within them; and concerning such separate things themselves. And after this, the farmer? original: "γεωργὸν" (georgon). This may be a name (Georgos) or a metaphor for a cultivator of the soul. must be well-disposed toward those being cared for; and of those living together. Amelius and Eustochius and those established in Egypt; the Munatius of Athens; the one concerning the Palatines; Ammonius by name; these men having also become most philosophical. The divine one, extraordinary in his readings, rich in every kind of wide learning; except for the explanation of technical matters, he offered nothing. But he retreated, having come from that art; of Atticus and Sabinus, among those men, it was not possible to be; but he especially surpassed him through the recollection of the books of Gaianus; the best from whom it is not possible to find the [truth]; his whole treasure of thought; not being reminded of the Platonic matters, which you yourself wrote for him; the one who made him agree with the Peripatetics; The Peripatetics were followers of Aristotle. Plotinus often sought to reconcile or critique Aristotelian thought in light of Plato. because neither Iamblichus nor the provocations; those who have not yet diminished the poems of the ancients to their atoms; they made a synthesis of books for them; just as they are somehow for Phoebion.
3. Zosimus where from him in freedom it is perhaps possible only to consider. For her things in all things are outside of the [physical]; who also said that Plotinus did not act according to the law; for what he was. All things before the art, the causes were nevertheless demonstrated; it happens for all to agree on what I again set forth.
Others attempted to make an arrangement of the books, such as George and Eustochius; who did not all see the things brought together in their own [works]; Amelius, before her, in name and Platonic things as his own. Concerning those things from which in the matters regarding the inquiry [he wrote] two books; there were also the things that were possible; some of the positions of the listeners he resolved; which one might have all of before they were written down in these [pages]; which Amelius held in these... adhering to the doctrines. The book [was written] after the siege of Athens Referring to the Herulian invasion of 267 AD, a significant historical marker for the dating of Plotinus's later works. before the council; before the presence of Eusebius having the lecture notes; original: "ὑπομνήματα" (hypomnemata) in which someone is in name. I ask to record the writings. The things for the discourse written concerning the leaders; the things for those people. Having taken all things first, those who were inscribed... having been persuaded by him; not in the headings for him... the verse of nature; the first of those before the present; to happen in that way to the book. But Aeneas; this poetic thing not being led; just as he himself does many things concerning the Platonic matters in two ways; of the follower testing the ideas; original: "ἰδεῶν" (ideon) it was for the common things to become very bad... and royal; nor did the simple one himself, remaining among the friends of God, becoming known according to the whole; not only accepting our own idiom; original: "ἰδίωμα" (idioma) to reckon the body to the demonstrations, but it was better... not having the methods concerning the ideas, to have written nothing as if something; but they would have given. It was much more authoritative; and in these they would have had an account and risked through themselves the things against Amelius again... from where else to answer; the things under him before us being praised for friendship... and the matter concerning the philosophy of Plotinus has been said; to him; only the matter of judgment...