/
This library is built in the open.
If you spot an error, have a suggestion, or just want to say hello — we’d love to hear from you.
Bacon, Roger · 1932

| It is asked whether the universal original: "universale." A universal is a general concept or category that can be applied to many individual things, such as the concept of "Circle" compared to a specific drawing of a circle. is more noble than the soul | 149 |
| It is asked whether the universal is only a pure intention original: "intentio." In medieval logic, an "intention" refers to a concept in the mind that "points to" or represents something in reality. | 150 |
| It is asked whether there are multiple universals | 151 |
| It is asked in which things universals are properly received | 151 |
| It is asked whether universals are necessary in the nature of things | 155 |
| It is asked whether it is possible for universals to remain if singular things original: "singularibus." These are individual, specific objects (like "this particular dog") as opposed to the general category (the universal "Dog"). are destroyed | 156 |
| (It is asked whether knowledge of the universal can exist if singular things do not exist) | 157 |
| (It is asked whether universals are posterior to singular things) To be "posterior" means to come after; Bacon is asking if the general category only exists because the individual things exist first. | 158 |
| It is asked whether universals are identical in essence with singular things | 158 |
| It is asked whether genera original: "genera" (plural of "genus"). These are broad classifications, like "Animal." are principles; it is asked whether universals are the principles of singular things | 159 |
| It is asked whether universals are principles of being alone (or of knowing the singular things themselves) | 159 |
| (It is asked whether the principles of being and of knowing are the same) | 160 |
| It is asked which of these is more of a principle: the genus or the species original: "species." A specific category within a genus, such as "Human" within the genus "Animal." | 161 |
| It is asked which of these is more noble | 161 |
| (It is asked which is more of a principle: the most general genus or the subordinate genus) | 162 |
| It is asked whether the genus is the principle of things by reason of power (essence or scope) | 163 |
| It is asked whether the genus is more divisible than the species | 164 |
| It is asked whether the genus can be preserved in a single species | 164 |
| It is asked why the species is preserved in a single individual, whereas the genus must necessarily be preserved in two species. It is asked whether the genus can be separated from the differences original: "differentiis." The specific characteristics that distinguish one species from another (e.g., "rationality" is the difference that distinguishes humans from other animals). | 165 |
| It is asked whether differences are principles | 166 |
| (It is asked whether differences are principles of genera or species) | 166 |
| (It is asked whether differences are finite or infinite) | 166 |
Folio 2, verso, column 2.
| It is asked here whether these three excel philosophy | 173 |
| It is asked whether it exalts science—namely, the desire for eternal happiness | 173 |