Previously Unpublished Works, Fascicle 13 (1909) - Page 12


This entry continues from the previous page. ...regarding the universal as a common predicable intention, whether the common predicable universal is prior to its particular as far as the operation of a particular nature is concerned	14
It is asked whether it is prior with respect to the intention of a particular nature	15
It is asked which of these is prior with respect to the operation of the aforementioned universal nature	15
It is asked which of these is prior with respect to the intention of a universal nature	16
It is asked concerning the comparison of the universal in relation to us, which of those is prior	16
It is asked how the universal is better known to us and to nature: it is asked which of those is better known with respect to nature	17
It is asked which of these is better known to us	17

⟨Neither therefore will magnitude be what it is, if indeed it is what truly is thus⟩

original: "Neque igitur magnitudo erit quod est, siquidem est quod vere est sic." This is a quotation from the text of Aristotle being discussed.


It is asked whether the physicist has to refute non-physical positions	18
It is asked whether all things are one immobile being: whether all things are one	19
It is asked how all things are one, whether according to matter or according to form	20
It is asked whether that being is immobile	20
It is asked, given that all things were one confused thing composed of substance and accident, whether it follows that there are many	20
It is asked, if it is posited that one being exists which is an accident, whether it is necessary to posit many	21
It is asked whether it follows: "if substance exists, accident exists"	22
It is asked, if all things are one continuum, whether because of this they are many	23
It is asked whether part and whole make one	23
It is asked whether part and whole are the same according to substance or different	24

⟨Confused etc.⟩

original: "Conturbati etc." This likely refers to a specific passage in Aristotle's text where the logic of earlier philosophers is criticized as being muddled.


It is asked whether an accident must be predicated of a substance	25
It is asked concerning the reasoning of Melissus: that what is created has...	25