/
This library is built in the open.
If you spot an error, have a suggestion, or just want to say hello — we’d love to hear from you.

| It is asked what the moving principle is in the motion of alteration | 86 motion of alteration: a change in quality, such as an object turning from cold to hot. |
| It is asked what the moving principle is in growth | 87 |
| It is asked what the principle is in motion according to place: it is asked what is "the straight" | 88 motion according to place: also called local motion or change of position. |
| It is asked what the internal moving principle is in circular motion | 88 |
| It is asked what the internal moving principle is in the motion of living beings | 89 living beings: literally "ensouled things," referring to plants, animals, and humans that have an internal source of movement. |
| It is asked which matter should be called nature: it is asked whether bare matter | 89 |
| folio 2, column a, line 1 It is asked what that form is, through which prime matter is called nature | 90 |
| It is asked whether substantial form is nature | 91 substantial form: the essential nature that makes a thing what it is, such as the "humanity" of a human. |
| It is asked whether accidental form is nature | 91 accidental form: a non-essential quality, like being tan or tall, which can change without the object becoming a different kind of thing. |
| It is asked concerning privation whether it is nature | 92 |
| It is asked whether the mathematicianoriginal manuscript reading: "methafisicus" (metaphysician) and the natural physicist consider the same things | 93 |
| It is asked whether it is possible to posit abstraction | 94 abstraction: the mental process of separating a quality or form from the physical matter it exists in. |
| It is asked whether the physicist ought to abstract | 95 |
| It is asked whether the natural philosopher can abstract form from matter | 95 |
| It is asked whether the mathematician ought to abstract form from matter | 96 |
| It is asked concerning continuous quantity, whether it ought to be abstracted from motion and matter | 97 |
| It is asked whether place can be abstracted by the mathematician | 98 |
| It is asked whether time can be abstracted by the mathematician | 98 |
| It is asked whether speech can be abstracted by the mathematician | 99 |
| It is asked what the matter is in which quantity ought to be and from which it ought to be abstracted | 99 |
| It is asked what this name "cause" signifies | 100 |
| It is asked whether "cause" is said univocally | 101 univocally: when a word is used with the exact same meaning in different instances. |
| It is asked of which cause "cause" is said first | 102 |
| It is asked which cause is more noble among the other three | 102 |
| It is asked concerning the property of the material cause | 103 material cause: the physical "stuff" out of which something is made, like the bronze of a statue. |
| It is asked concerning the property of form, which indicates what the being of a thing is | 104 being of a thing: original "esse rei," referring to the essential existence or definition of an object. |