Previously Unpublished Works, Fascicle 13 (1909) - Page 19

Question	Page
(It is asked concerning the arguments of Aristotle against [the infinite])	145
It is asked whether the infinite exists in actuality actuality: "actu" in the original, referring to something that is fully realized or currently existing in fact.	146
It is asked whether any continuous thing is infinite in actuality	147
It is asked whether one can posit an infinite number as infinite in actuality	147
It is asked whether one can posit an infinite in potentiality potentiality: "potentia" in the original, referring to the capacity to be or become something, even if it is not currently so.	149
It is asked whether the infinite exists in pure potentiality or in potentiality mixed with actuality	149
It is asked whether the existence of the infinite is successive or permanent A "successive" infinite would be like time or a sequence of numbers, while a "permanent" infinite would be a physical object that is infinitely large all at once.	150
It is asked whether every part of the infinite is infinite	151
It is asked whether any part of the infinite is infinite	152
It is asked whether a body composed of elements has any infinite part	152
It is asked what the infinite is: it is asked whether the infinite is in a genus In Aristotelian logic, a "genus" is a broad category or class of things.	153
It is asked whether it is in the genus of substance or accident accident: a property that exists in something else but is not essential to its nature, such as color or size.	154
It is asked whether the infinite is an accident	155
It is asked whether it is a quantity	156
It is asked whether it is in the category of relation category: "predicamentum" in the original, referring to one of Aristotle's ten ways of classifying existence.	156
It is asked whether it is in the category of action or passion In this context, "passion" refers to being acted upon by an external force.	156
It is asked whether the finite and infinite are in the category of quality	157
It is asked what the infinite is, it is asked concerning the definition of the infinite, which is: the infinite is that of which nothing is outside, whether it is a good definition original: "infinitum est cujus nichil est extra". This paradoxically sounds like a definition of the "whole" or "perfect" rather than the infinite.	158
It is asked concerning another definition of the infinite, which is: the infinite is that from which those taking quantity can always take something outside original: "infinitum est cujus quantitatem accipientibus semper est aliquid sumere extra". This describes an infinite process, like counting.	159
It is asked whether the continuous is divisible to infinity	159
It is asked whether natural magnitude is divisible to infinity	160
It is asked whether there is addition to magnitude to infinity or not addition: "appositio" in the original, referring to the process of adding parts together.	161
It is asked whether, excluding division, there occurs addition of magnitude to infinity	162
It is asked what is the cause why magnitude does not go to infinity, excluding division absolutely	163
It is asked whether in any way magnitude can grow to infinity	164
It is asked how there is infinity in numbers: it is asked whether the addition of numbers goes to infinity	164
(It is asked whether the division of magnitude is to infinity)	165
It is asked whether number is divisible to infinity	166