Previously Unpublished Works, Fascicle 13 (1909) - Page 23

Question	Page
It is asked what time is according to its genus: it is asked whether time is a substance or an accident original: "substantia vel accidens". In medieval philosophy, a substance exists by itself, while an accident is a property that must exist within something else, such as color or size.	250
It is asked whether it is in the category of quantity original: "in predicamento quantitatis". Categories, or predicaments, are the fundamental ways in which things can be described.	251
It is asked whether it is a continuous or discrete original: "continua vel discreta" quantity. Continuous quantities can be divided infinitely, like a line. Discrete quantities are made of distinct units, like numbers. quantity	251
It is asked whether it is composed of both continuous and discrete parts	252
It is asked whether time is a quantity in itself or by accident	253
It is asked whether time is the number of motion	253
It is asked whether time is a numbering number or a numbered number original: "numerus numerans vel numeratus". A numbering number is the act of counting, while a numbered number is the total quantity of the things being counted.	253
It is asked whether it is the number of motion according to the before and after original: "prius et posterius". This refers to Aristotle's definition of time as the measurement of change relative to the sequence of events.	254
It is asked whether substance is the subject of time	255
It is asked what is the precise and immediate subject of time itself	256
(It is asked whether it is primarily the measure of the motion of the heavens)	257
It is asked whether the instant original: "instans". The instant is the indivisible "now" that connects the past to the future. has being	257
It is asked what the instant is: it is asked whether it is a quantity	258
It is asked whether the instant can be a species within a genus	259
(It is asked whether the instant is the number of that which is moved according to the before and after)	260
It is asked what the precise subject of the instant is	260
(It is asked whether the instant is the substance of time)	261
It is asked how the instant is the substance of time	262
It is asked how the instant makes time	263
It is asked whether there is one instant or many	263
It is asked whether the instant can be the boundary of time	264
It is asked whether one and the same instant, according to its substance, is the boundary of the past and the future	265
It is asked whether the instant that is the substance of time is the same as the instant that is its boundary	266
folio 2 verso, column 1. It is asked whether the same instant is the end of one time and the boundary of another	267
It is asked concerning the comparison of eternity to time, whether they are different measures	268
It is asked whether the age original: "evum". In medieval thought, the "aevum" is a duration intermediate between time and eternity, often applied to angels and celestial bodies. and time are the same	270
It is asked how the "now" of time relates to eternity, and whether they are the same	271
It is asked whether the "now" of time and the "age" are the same	272
It is asked concerning the "now" of eternity, of the age, and of time, whether they are the same or different	273