/
This library is built in the open.
If you spot an error, have a suggestion, or just want to say hello — we’d love to hear from you.

| It is asked whether it is the act of that which exists in actuality or in potentiality original: "actus... in potentia". Aristotle defined motion as the actuality of a potential being as such. | 298 |
| It is asked whether violent rest is the act of that which exists in potentiality | 298 |
| It is asked what it is to be "at the same time" original: "simul esse". This refers to the concept of simultaneity in time or space. | 299 |
| It is asked which things are touching: it is asked what touch is | |
| mathematical [touch] | 300 |
| It is asked what this act is and how it differs from natural touch | 301 |
| It is asked concerning things that touch: touching things are those whose extremities are together original: "tangentia sunt quorum ultima sunt simul". This is Aristotle’s definition of contact in Physics Book 5. | 302 |
| It is asked whether the transition from one extreme to another occurs through some medium | 302 |
| It is asked what makes motion one according to genus original: "in genere". A genus is a broad category, such as "change of place" or "change of quality." | 303 |
| It is asked what is the cause of the unity of motion according to species original: "secundum speciem". Species refers to a specific type within a genus, like "walking" or "whitening." | 305 |
| It is asked whether the unity of the end-point and the space is sufficient for there to be a single motion in species | 305 |
| It is asked what is the cause of the unity of motion according to number original: "secundum numerum". This refers to numerical identity, asking if a motion is literally the same individual event. | 306 |
| It is asked whether health acquired through different motions is the same according to number | 308 |
| It is asked whether health in the same subject in the evening and the morning is the same | 309 |
| It is asked whether regular motion is more unified than irregular motion | 309 |
| It is asked whether circular motion is more unified than straight motion | 310 |
| It is asked whether motion has a contrary: it is asked whether one motion is contrary to another motion | 311 |
| It is asked whether natural downward motion is contrary to natural upward motion | 312 |
| It is asked whether violent motion is contrary to natural motion | 313 |
| It is asked whether natural rest is opposed to motion | 314 |
| It is asked whether violent rest after motion is opposed to motion | 314 |
| It is asked whether rest before motion is opposed to motion | 314 |
| It is asked concerning the contrariety between different states of rest | 315 |
| It is asked which rest is opposed to which rest, and whether natural rest is opposed to natural rest | 315 |
| It is asked concerning alterations, whether they are opposed as contraries original: "immutationibus". This refers to qualitative changes. | 316 |
| It is asked what is opposed to change, whether it is rest or another change | 316 |
| It is asked whether a point exists only in the soul or outside the soul original: "punctus... in anima". This asks whether a geometric point is a mental concept or a physical reality. | 317 |
| It is asked what a point is | 318 |