Elegantiarum Linguae Latinae Libri Sex

Against the same concerning Instratum and Stragula. Ch. XLVI.
Against the same concerning Pulsatio and Verberatio. Ch. XLVII.
Against the same concerning Pellex and Palla. Ch. XLVIII.
Against the same concerning Cavillatio. Ch. XLIX.
Against the same concerning Praevaricator, Tergiversator, and Calumniator. Ch. L.
Against the same concerning Feri, Portari, Agi. Ch. LI.
Against the same concerning Convitium and Maledictum. Ch. LII.
Against the same concerning Versicolor. Ch. LIII.
Against the same concerning Penes and Apud. Ch. LIV.
Against the same concerning Patres, Maiores, Posteri, and Minores. Ch. LV.
Against the same concerning Victus and Penus. Ch. LVI.
Against the same concerning Hypotheca. Ch. LVII.
Against the same concerning Ferrumen. Ch. LVIII.
Against the same concerning Veterator and Novitius. Ch. LIX.
Against the same concerning Quotannis and similar terms. Ch. LX.
Against the same concerning Turba and Rixa. Ch. LXI.
Against the same concerning Exauctoro. Ch. LXII.
Against the same concerning Depectus. Ch. LXIII.
Against the same concerning Gemma and Lapillus. Ch. LXIV.

ON THE RECIPROCATION OF SUI AND SUUS.

In what way Sui and Suus differ between us and the Greeks. Ch. I.
That there are not three types of construction for the aforementioned pronouns, but that reciprocation is sufficient. Ch. II.
Whence the term Reciprocatio is derived. Ch. III.
How a solecism is admitted in the case of sui and suus. Ch. IV.
The first reason why we misuse Sui and Suus in place of Eius, Ipsius, or Illius. Ch. V.
The second reason for the same. Ch. VI.
The third reason. Ch. VII.
The fourth reason. Ch. VIII.
The reason why we misuse Eius, Ipsius, and Illius in place of Suus. Ch. IX.
How ambiguity is avoided in the use of sui and suus. Ch. X.
That phrases such as Suus est illius servus are poorly spoken. Ch. XI.
That Suus cannot be added to Ciceronis or istius filius for the sake of distinction or emphasis, but rather that it is redundant. Ch. XII.