This library is built in the open.
If you spot an error, have a suggestion, or just want to say hello — we’d love to hear from you.

T A B L E
someone who has more opinion than force. chap. 11. p. 104
Whether it is better, fearing to be assaulted, to move or to wait for war. chap. 12. p. 105
That one comes from low to great fortune more with fraud than with force. chap. 13. p. 107
Men are often deceived, believing they can conquer pride with humility. chap. 14. p. 108
Weak states will always be ambiguous in resolving, and slow deliberations are always harmful. chap. 15. p. 109
How soldiers in our times differ from the ancient orders. chap. 16. p. 111
How much artillery should be esteemed by armies in the present times, and if the opinion generally held of it is true. chap. 17. p. 113
How, because of the authority of the Romans and the example of the ancient militia original: "milizia", infantry should be esteemed more than cavalry. chap. 18. p. 117
That acquisitions in Republics that are not well-ordered, and that do not proceed according to Roman virtue, lead to the ruin, not the exaltation, of them. chap. 19. p. 120
What danger that Prince, or that Republic, brings upon itself that makes use of auxiliary or mercenary militia. chap. 20. p. 122
The first Praetor A high-ranking Roman magistrate that the Romans sent anywhere was to Capua, 400 years after they began to make war. chap. 21. p. 123
How often the opinions of men in judging things are false. chap. 22. p. 125
How the Romans, in judging their subjects, due to some accident that necessitated such judgment, avoided the middle path. chap. 23. p. 127
Fortresses are generally much more harmful than useful. chap. 24. p. 129
That assaulting a divided city, by means of its disunity, is a contrary strategy. chap. 25. p. 133