The Veterinary Medicine of Chiron (Mulomedicina Chironis)

I silently removed most of them, concerning which I shall now speak, since—as the writers on rural matters say—a pile of manure must keep its place.

And often monsters arise from words torn apart and badly glued together, all of which I have removed. I do not know, however, if these are worth remembering:

ilinigomen fragmastro fuscoli for ilingon enfragma strofus coli 62 15

rene sana colema for renes anacollema 155 26

arridas in tessis for arida sintessis (i.e., syntexis wasting away) 47 10

quo demorigia for quod emorigia (i.e., haemorrhagia bleeding) 44 27

protocommios emisse for protocomio semisse 83 22

qui dum oris for quid umoris 184 13

caldaver venarum for calda vervenarum 161 26

iocine reumor for iocinere umor 48 23

infundit operos for infundito per os 159 1

sed et for sedet et and more often interchangeably

mensuri saticis for mensuris Atticis 109 20

ruptione momenti for ruptionem omenti 65 14

eviriet uret for evirietur et 74 19

superari dum for super aridum 225 16

fortiores se for fortior esse 111 2

quae res for quaeres 190 2

quia ut for qui aut 225 12

quia quam for qui aquam 69 10

irinillirica often for irin Illirica.

I have joined prepositions with the following words according to my own judgment, for example, I wrote:

supervenam for super venam 215 2

supragambam for supra gambam 17 21

subilia for sub ilia 152 15.

I have separated prepositions from the substantives that depend on them six hundred times.

That the system of barbaric orthography cannot hold is evident from the fact that the scribe, besides his solecistic word forms,