The Extant Greek Works of Apollonius of Perga, Vol. II

Urbin. 73 The manuscript U is copied from v; see II p. 326, 13 ΗΘ καί HΘ and] ΗΘΚ with a lacuna of 2 letters Ww, ηϑκ v, ἡ ϑκ U, ϑη m. 2 second hand; p. 342, 16 εἰς τὸ λγ’ to the 33rd] W w, om. vU, εἰς τὸ λδ’ to the 34th mg. in margin m. 2 U.

Paris. suppl. 451, Paris. 2358 Furthermore, codices 4 and 5 are copied from v; see II p. 168, 9 ἐπινοῆσαι to devise] Ww, ἐπιχειρῆσαι to attempt vU, 4, 5, corr. corrected m. 2 U and 5; II p. 170, 11 ἐν in] Ww, om. vU, 4, 5, corr. m. 2 U.

Mutin. I will demonstrate below on p. XXI that the Modenese codex II D 4 also depends on v.

Vat. 1575 Paris. 2357 Codices 1 and 3, both of which were written by Ioannes Hydruntinus John of Otranto, depend on W itself; for they repeat all its faults, even the most minute, with the greatest fidelity.

Paris. 2342 p also depends on W; for it not only contains the same foolish errors very frequently (II p. 174, 14; 176, 24; 180, 6; 194, 4; 212, 15; 214, 4, 12; 222, 13, 16; 228, 5; 234, 17; 238, 25; 248, 20; 268, 7; 274, 22; 278, 1; 280, 1, 4, 12; 284, 7; 302, 3, 5; 308, 23; 312, 3; 314, 6; 320, 9, 15; 324, 2, 11; 346, 1; 350, 9; 358, 2; 360, 5) and the same lacunae and omissions (II p. 196, 26; 218, 10; 290, 8; 292, 1, 14; 306, 8; 308, 14; 310, 6; 334, 22; 338, 15; 340, 13, 15; 342, 20; 344, 14; 346, 17, 19; 352, 19); but there are not a few places of such a kind as to seem to demonstrate that it was copied from W itself. Of this type I cite the following:
II p. 172, 21 ΑΕΖ] om. W at the end of the line, om. p;
p. 200, 5 τέμνουσα cutting] τέμνουσα W, τέμνουσαι cutting (plural) p;
p. 208, 23 ΝΘ] W, but the letter N is similar to H, ΗΘ p;
p. 286, 21 τῶν of the (alt.)] om. W at the end of the line, om. p;
p. 294, 1 κατασκευήν construction] followed by a lacuna, as it seems, because of the diagram in W, lac. p (nothing seems to be missing);