The Extant Greek Works of Apollonius of Perga, Vol. II

II p. 306, 2 A, B] AB | AB W, αβ αβ p;
p. 328, 4 ΔΗΑ] the letter H is similar to Π in W, ΔΠΑ p;
p. 340, 16 τὴν ΛΞ the ΛΞ] τῇ νλξ W, τὴν λξ p;
p. 356, 7 καί and (pr.)] 'ἐστωσ' let them be καί m. 1 W (that is, ἔστωσαν let them be started to be repeated from line 6, but deleted), ἔστω let it be καί p.

It is also worth mentioning that the reading at II p. 170, 24, noted by W¹ from another codex, also appears in the same way in the margin of p. Cf. p. 220, 16.

It is certainly agreed that p, in very many places—not to mention corrected errors that arose from the confusion of the vowels η and ι, o and ω—exhibits better readings (II p. 172, 2, 18; 174, 22; 188, 10; 190, 15, 18; 192, 15; 194, 20, 26; 196, 17; 198, 8, 13; 208, 13, 14; 210, 22; 218, 17; 220, 18?; 240, 12, 13, 27; 246, 2; 248, 2, 23; 254, 5, 8; 260, 4, 21; 262, 20, 22, 27; 264, 24; 268, 13; 274, 5; 276, 17; 280, 19; 282, 20; 284, 17, 19; 286, 19; 290, 18; 294, 7; 298, 8, 10; 300, 20; 302, 13; 304, 13, 16; 306, 3, 9; 310, 14, 15; 312, 1, 2; 316, 23; 326, 16; 330, 7; 332, 21; 336, 19; 348, 5, 9; 352, 2, 15; 358, 8, 20; 360, 7). But there is none among all these emendations that exceeds the capacity of a scribe even moderately skilled in words and matters. Therefore, since the scribe of codex p showed both his skill and his boldness in Apollonius by either emending or interpolating, as we shall argue below with certain documents, I do not hesitate to attribute all these to his conjecture. This is confirmed by other things. For first, p sometimes has a false reading of codex W that was corrected later by the first hand (II p. 184, 27; 214, 12; 316, 16; 348, 14; cf. p. 234, 22;