This library is built in the open.
If you spot an error, have a suggestion, or just want to say hello — we’d love to hear from you.

Paris Codex Gr. 2471, paper, 16th century, Mazarin, which is mentioned in the printed catalog of the Parisian library, no longer exists.*) I have not seen the Paris supplement Gr. 869, paper, 18th century, which from folio 114 contains "Notes on Apollonius of Perga." The Barberini codex II, 58, paper, 16th century, contains in folios 64—68 Conics III, 1—6 and part of proposition 7. I have noted nothing about the Magliabecchian codex XI, 7 (paper, 16th century); it contains Conics I—IV. The Magliabecchian codex XI, 26, 16th century, besides Philoponus on Nicomachus, contains several figures excerpted from Greek codices of Eutocius and Apollonius. The Ambrosian codex A 230 inf. contains a Latin interpretation of Apollonius and Eutocius, about which these things are read on page 1: "The Conics of Apollonius, translated into Latin by the study of Federicus Commandinus and augmented with commentaries, the very ones which were sent to the press, annotated in many places in the margin by the hand of Commandinus himself, are consecrated to the most illustrious and most ample Cardinal Federicus Borromaeus, in gratitude for his Ambrosian library, so that he may also perpetuate his dearest relative, by Mutius Oddus of Urbino." Finally, the Upsala codex 56 contains a Latin interpretation of the Conics "done in London of the Goths original: "Londini Gothorum" - likely referring to Lund, Sweden by Nicolaus Schenmark from the 29th of July to the 13th of September 1762, in the space of 40 days" based on Halley’s edition (it has, besides Conics I—VII, also the eighth book, the Halleyan restoration).
*) Where the codex described in Paris by Constantinus Palaeocappa (Omont, Catalogue of the Greek manuscripts copied by Palaeocappa, Paris 1886, p. 6) has ended up, I do not know.