On Agriculture

— 52, 11. qui fit instead of a quo fit from v. 14 Schoell. — 53, 5. Regarding these, cf. what Hempel explained on p. 60. — 54, 28. I followed Keil; but cf. Hempel p. 43. — 55, 4 sqq. Cf. Hempel p. 43 adn. 2. — 55, 6. Hempel p. 44 expects et instead of aut. — 55, 8. Schoell suspects that rore frigidiore tinguntur or something similar should be placed. — 57, 5. In that Olck in his Realencyclopädie under 'Ernte' expects spinas or stirpes instead of stipulas (cf. Bluemner 'Privataltert.' p. 570 adn. 11), he erred; for stipulae are stalks, about which cf. de l. l. V 136. One could think from this passage about corradere (cradere = eradere), but I would not call even this entirely necessary. — 58, 1. in ea scil. messe is defended by Heidrich 'der Stil des V.' p. 55. cum should not be deleted, indeed it should either be supplied as commode or something of that kind should be understood. — 58, 31. I retained quod with the same Varron. I p. 31. — 60, 25. I accepted in acervis; iactando scil. dum in acervis sunt. — 62, 3. aminneas Scantianas is defended by Hempel p. 15, perhaps rightly. — 64, 12. accesserunt anni, culeum promitur Zahlfeldt l. s. s. — 67, 32. Regarding those things which seem to have fallen out, cf. Francken Mnemos XXVIII (a. 1900) p. 294. — 70, 12. Proceeding from 'extrita littera' which Keil devised, it is commended by external appearance, but in reality it is rejected; for it is not apparent how Varro slipped into the form bealare. Rather, mela — mala seem to demand forms like belare — balare: hence Friedrich and likewise at the same time Schoell proposed baelare (cf. baeto — beto and the like): although even this is not without suspicion. — 71, 11 sq. [a maiore] ut a minore Porcius Ovinius Caprilius, sic a maiore Schoell. — 72, 27. neutro ⟨opus⟩ Schoell. — 74, 8. choiron, ut supplendum sit ⟨volvam enim Graeci⟩ vocant χοῖρον, a quo Schoell. — 74, 12. No one doubts that subgrumi is false; but it is strange that the gloss grumi ἀκρομάσθιον exists II 223, 60. — 74, 16. (qui iam) porci puri sunt Ellis Hermath. X (1899) p. 283. — 75, 1. contrariam defended by Ellis l. s. s. — 75, 4 sq. si qui et ⟨os⟩ adapertum Ellis l. s. s. p. 284. — 75, 8. caedat perhaps can be defended from those things which Thes. l. l. p. 58 brings forward