Sigalion in the Shield of Croesiades or Apologetic Dialogue for the Mystery of Detected Syncretism

ferocity, so that you may begin; (g) let persuasion play its part here; let reason act; let the (h) friendliness of conversation act. It will happen thus that if the enemy later attempts something, he will dash his ship against the reefs of the Cretan island. Conversely, Jupiter, offended by a light treatment of religions, will look back, albeit late, to his (i) diphthera parchment/record book.

I understand, I think, my Cræsiades, what kind of monster Syncretism is?
Indeed, a constant invention (from both sides, and therefore by your own confession) of civil dissensions through intermission or suspension, and the conjunction of strengths and arms through dialysis kai systasis dissolution and re-establishment, to repress external enemies threatening the dissidents, lasting as long as fear and danger last, and to go off into smoke and winds when they cease; and thus a conjunction not solid, but to break out again into syrraxis clash/collision.
If I shall demonstrate a little later that this entire definition (only removing the word CIVIL and substituting the word RELIGIOUS, which is what I want to be treated uniquely here—I am not making my civil transactions here; because it is certainly permissible to show an analogy, not an tautotes identity: for no one would easily be so dense as to say that the concord of Christian religions sought today is the very same syncretism that the Cretans once worshipped; it is enough that there is the same analogia analogy of form, counsel, and event that applies to the Teutonic Syncretism—what more will you desire? Will you give yourself up as captured, or will you speak of things that should be kept silent, and will you commit to letters what is already obliterated? Add a conjecture as probable as it can be in the traces which devouring time has obscured, and which forgetfulness of circumstances has darkened, but not entirely erased. And so that