This library is built in the open.
If you spot an error, have a suggestion, or just want to say hello — we’d love to hear from you.
Stucki, Johann Wilhelm · 1577

A decorative woodcut initial letter V contains floral patterns.
SINCE we must undertake and do nothing in this life, which is so full of suspicions and slanders, for which we cannot render at least some probable account: therefore, as I prepare to commit to writing the life of Iosias Simler, a most distinguished man, I think it proper to propose the causes that have impelled me to this task, not so much for his dignity as for my own modest ability. And I consider this work to be all the more worthwhile because today there are many who, led or rather seduced partly by malevolence and envy, and partly by a certain boorish and barbaric ignorance, condemn, mock, and despise these honorific descriptions of the lives of men illustrious for their praise and virtue.
First of all, it is sufficiently well known that this is not some new custom, but a most ancient one, to consecrate in literary monuments the words, deeds, and counsels of those who have been famous and illustrious for their talent, doctrine, wisdom, and other virtues, and who have contributed great advantages and benefits to the human race. This is attested to, if I may mention only a few examples out of countless ones, by the commentaries of Xenophon on Socrates, the wisest of the Greeks, and by Plutarch on many illustrious Greek and Roman men. Among Christians, St. Jerome and Epiphanius, two most brilliant lights of the Church, devoted much labor and study to describing the lives of certain illustrious persons of both sexes.
Furthermore, we see that it is customary today, in all well-mannered and established Academies, that the lives and praises of those who were an ornament and benefit to the school and church are celebrated in public speeches and writings after they have departed from this life. This custom, as has been said, is very common today just as it was in the past, and it seems worthy of praise for many reasons, whether one considers it from the standpoint of honor or utility. For first of all, to whom, I ask, does it not seem fair and just that an honorable mention be made in public speeches and writings of those who, to the glory of God and for the benefit of men—