... De pacto revenditionis sive restitutionis conclusiones

from the contractus pignoratitio pledge or mortgage contract, with which it agrees in many things, but in some it disagrees.

XX.
Hence it is probably doubted: if a vassal alienating a fiefdom, where the obligation was made in the words of a sale with an agreement of resale, but the consent of the Lord of the fiefdom was obtained for this contract in the words of a pledge or loan contract, which should be adhered to, the obligation or the consent?

XXI.
It is truer that the words of the obligation prevail.

XXII.
Furthermore, so that the seller may reclaim the item, an offering is sufficient, that is, the sealing and solemn depositing of the price.

XXIII.
Provided it is equal to that which was paid in the first sale, although it has pleased some that it be otherwise.

XXIIII.
Once the price is offered, the buyer must be compelled precisely to restore the item, nor is he freed by the payment of the interest.

XXV.
This holds even in the case where the agreement is conceived such that the item be resold, and thus an obligation of doing results from it.

For