... subsequentes conclusiones pro insigniis doctoralibus in u.i. consequendis

IX.
Whence we read that in a plainly related matter it was asked, whether the same should be determined regarding the division of goods produced while the marriage is in force? This has been decided, and I embrace it.

X.
But what if the goods are not provincial, but are situated outside the husband's jurisdiction? Rubeus is the author as testimony by Covarruvias that the common opinion is to the contrary. But I believe that the same should be established here as above.

XI.
Regarding the loss of the dowry, the common school of legal doctors teaches that a woman loses her dowry because of a kiss. However, it seems milder and truer that this should not cause such a grave loss.

XII.
For those born from just marriages (for we speak mostly of these) who are under age, because they cannot defend themselves by reason of their age, Guardians are appointed, whose assignment I ascribe to mixtum imperium mixed authority/mixed jurisdiction.

XIII.
Where it is fitting to add that the duty of the judge lies not so much in giving Guardians as in hearing their excuses: and it does not matter if these occur in the same person.

XIIII.
Humans contract while living, they sometimes commit crimes, and they make wills while dying.

XV.
Donation can be referred among contracts, to which also stipulation belongs, although it contains no συνάλλαγμα reciprocal obligation.

XVI.
Regarding a lease which is made for more than five or ten years, the doctors commonly conclude that it passes into another name of contract, and from there useful ownership is transferred; those doctors I do not follow here.