Suffragante consensu amplissimi consultissimique ordinis Iuridicae facultatis, in inclyta & celeberrima Basiliensium Academia, pro consequendis in utroque iure Doctoralibus insignijs, Deo Ter Opt. Max. praeside, Subsequentia de privilegiis creditorum Themata

he is not admitted to claiming other assets: and therefore, the second creditor will not be so much more potent regarding his own pledge as he will be the sole claimant.

XXXVII.
Moreover, this holds even if the general obligation was not conceived for the case where the special one would be insufficient, but was attached simply.

XXXIIX.
Clearly, if goods, both present and future, were bound to two creditors at different times, it has never been doubted that the later creditor does not compete with the earlier one regarding assets acquired after the earlier obligation, even if before his own; rather, the earlier one alone has the right of claim, even regarding those acquired later.

XXXIX.
What must be said concerning goods acquired by the debtor after the second obligation? We believe the same must still be established, and that the fiscus public treasury should not be exempted by a special privilege, although there are those who hold the contrary.

XL.
For a mortgage on things to be acquired, although it finally begins with effect from the time of acquisition, is nevertheless retracted to the time of the obligation.