This library is built in the open.
If you spot an error, have a suggestion, or just want to say hello — we’d love to hear from you.

How could the propagation within the same not also be accidental?
Ans. If this were even the case, then according to further Naturgesetzen laws of nature and experiences, only one thing of its kind could have been brought forth and could still be brought forth in actu in reality; and this, moreover, for only a single time.
Q. This, too, is entirely correct. Could there not also well be a chance of the second kind taking place here, which would consist as much in the duration of the generation and propagation as in the multiplication increase/reproduction?
Ans. But even if I were to grant you this, no reduction resolution or breaking down of things would take place.
Q. What do you understand by reduction of things, and how do you make this reduction dependent upon the accidental or necessary nature of the existence of the physical world with its attributis attributes?
Ans. The irrefutable answer to this is not lacking; however, for the completeness of the same, I currently lack three works in actu in reality for reference, which I do not have at hand to correctly and mutually arrange the analytic analysis of contingency, necessity, and reduction