This library is built in the open.
If you spot an error, have a suggestion, or just want to say hello — we’d love to hear from you.

teaches us, however, sufficiently of the contrary and finally convinces us of the improbability and impossibility of this hypothesis.
But let us assume the case that everything from its perfect inception henceforth worsens. Then, first, the deduced laws of nature would have to confirm through experience again that all and every perfectly originated individua individuals went along this path, determined once and for all according to laws.
Second, it must again be decided: is the perfection of things, their worsening, and the power of this effect, a) again accidental or b) necessary?
They cannot be accidental, otherwise change arises again and with it the contradiction. But they also cannot be necessary, otherwise no worsening could take place without contradiction.
Q. Do you not, despite these demonstrated hypotheses, suspect a case that, notwithstanding your refutation rejection of the priorem in forma former in form—could lead to the demonstration and assertion
Catchword: Demon-