† MH KEL

It is sought
how one must analyze the
things laid down: or whether the whole must arrive completely. ......?
......?
......?
......?
......?
......?
......?
......?
......?
......?
......?
......?
......?
......?
......?
......?
......?
......?
......?

We find this eagerness, separated over a wide area, being blamed by some who do not read the text reasonably: whence all know this. It is therefore worthy to know that, before proceeding about the one reading, one must understand the elements and forms found within it.
And the things placed below, having been separated: For even the powers of heaven and earth have settled together.
It is sought first what is the assigned idion proper attribute, and what is the significant name.

By name, we do not mean just any name, but the one that will provide the logos reason/definition for it. For there are some who are understood, or rather, the whole of philosophy is an assigned opinion: so that one might speak of things related to the matter, if indeed we find every art subjected to the philosopher. For every art and science is subordinate to the discourse concerning all things. Therefore, all other arts and sciences profess this, such as the leading principle and the primacy for all. But who, upon hearing this, would not laugh, and would not possess understanding? But the name and the teacher are being overlooked; therefore, what is it, and he who would separate the citizens from something, takes refuge in some of the writings, from which who is chosen? But if one applies the name to the one who has approached the study of philosophy,

we must make the briefest summary for ourselves, and there are six chapters so that the genus
it receives the things. First is the presentation of the teachings, and if anything follows after the presentation, it would not befit philosophy, as if someone took the lead in attention
and the ancient name and the presentation

to the school of this man, again their practice is artificial: for example, if there is something without, if there is a cause, the cause of the presentation, and what attention is in it; and what is the form in it; and what is the property; and what is the beneficial. And do not be a partner to those who theorize the cause of the presentation because, for what do they have need? Or in what way will the presentation be at the entry.
† The cause of this is because

such a thing is voluntary. The definitive, the demonstrative, and the analytic.
the three are destructive and the

speaking of it long before, one must place the attention used toward whom, as the proposition says. For the heretical things create noise, but those of the arts toward many of the living it is worthy to accept already clearly. To define only the horse, the ox, and the human
but the definition ......?

in this way proceeding to the nature of things. That some things, a logical being, at least of God
† but the dialectical ......?

as an animal, dialectical of all existing things, because the definitive, and discourse requires a definition, which is a short discourse declarative of the nature of the underlying thing: the demonstrative is a syllogism of true premises, and before the others demonstrating the proposition. It is necessary to reject the idea that the genus will be shown not from this, but before the end it will show in the solution of the fall.
Before the solution of the definition, let us show how a human is an animal.