Repetitio et Dilvcidior Explicatio Consensvs Veteris Orthodoxae Catholicaeque Christi Ecclesiae in doctrina prophetica & apostolica, de inconfusis proprietatibus naturarum Christi Domini, in vna indiuisa persona permanentibus adeoque de veritate carnis Christi ad dexteram Dei patris, in coelo sedentis & non ubique praesentis

REPETITIO ET DILVCID.

And thus far I have discoursed incidentally on the words necessary for explaining this mystery more clearly, and I have shown briefly that those things which are expressed or signified by those words and forms of speech are openly taught in the writings of the prophets and apostles, and for that reason can justly be repudiated by no pious person.

That by the resurrection of Christ, the hypostatic union is not dissolved, but the true body of the Lord assumed by the Word in the mother’s womb truly rose from the dead. CAP. IIII.

It remains that now we also demonstrate that that hypostatic union in Christ was not dissolved by the resurrection of Christ, but that the truth of Christ’s flesh, or the property of human nature, remains entire or inviolate in the rising Lord, and after his resurrection and clarification, and at the same time we explain what kind of conditions the glorified body either receives or requires or rejects, and what kind of body the rising Christ possesses.

The truth of the flesh remains in the resurrection. And indeed it is certain that that hypostatic union in Christ was not abolished by his resurrection from the dead, or changed in the slightest. For it is truly and catholically said that God, having once assumed man in the incarnation, never dismissed or put him off. Therefore our Lord